Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Boobs n’ Boobs

As postmodern collision montage gave way to ironic representationalism in the early aughts, a Banksian sense of play returned under a more generalized Rauch-inspired urban political critique. This formalism, giving way to expressionist renderings of interiority, took the form of spectacle rooted in street art class-style exhibitionist critique.

We see an equivalent with post-Gehry architecture, and certainly with boobsy mcboosal boobs. For once a diacritic sense of formalism returned, at least in a Derridean deconstructionist sense, then dudes holding rubber boobs became art followed shortly thereafter.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Loading ... Loading ...
# posted by douchebag1
Links n' stuff:
12:12 pm July, 10 creature said...

4 boobs here…none attached to a female

12:25 pm July, 10 DoucheyWallnuts said...

Pictures like this, and having to sign in every time, fills me with ennui. Ennui, I says.

12:39 pm July, 10 Nancy Dreuche said...

It’s pretty badass not having to sign in like you regular Joes. My plan actually worked. And hey Hermit, they found your girlfriend. Well, parts of her at least.

1:23 pm July, 10 Dr. Bunsen HoneyDouche said...

Whenever anyone invites you to give the guest lecture at the Transitional Asian Illicit Titty Seminar and these four show up to “proof” you speech and offer props for the presentation, politely decline and then start snorting bath salts. You’ll need them. Trust me.

1:24 pm July, 10 Et Tu Douche? said...

Damn Four-Prong has seen better days and that dress is less then flattering.

2:03 pm July, 10 DoucheyWallnuts said...

I find it interesting that Japanese dabble in all kinds of Alt-Sexual deviancies, and yet showing pubes is considered to be the ultimate taboo. Na mean?

2:50 pm July, 10 Baron Von Goolo said...

Pibbles on stun, Captain.

2:51 pm July, 10 Baron Von Goolo said...

(pew pew pew)

3:09 pm July, 10 Stephanie said...

Is this a band promo photo for The Boobs? The Nips?
There’s nothing here,move on.

3:42 pm July, 10 Troy Tempest said...

Neomaterialist nihilism in the works of Tarantino
Ludwig F. Scuglia
Department of Deconstruction, University of Illinois
.
1. Narratives of meaninglessness
.
“Society is intrinsically a legal fiction,” says Sontag. Lacan’s essay on capitalist predialectic theory suggests that the raison d’etre of the writer is booby suckle. Thus, several desituationisms concerning Derridian reading exist. “Truth is part of the futility of consciousness,” says Foucault; however, according to Pickett, it is not so much truth that is part of the futility of consciousness, but rather boobosity, and eventually the genre, of boobs. The ground/figure distinction prevalent in Tarantino’s Jackie Brown is also evident in Pulp Fiction, although in a more mythopoetical sense. But if capitalist predialectic theory holds, we have to choose between neomaterialist boobs and subdialectic boobs.
.
In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between tits and boobs. Textual deappropriation holds that narrativity serves to marginalize the proletariat, given that the premise of capitalist predialectic booby suckle thigh is valid. In a sense, Debord promotes the use of predialectic titty theory to modify class actions of twat waffles.
.
If one examines neomaterialist nihilism, one is faced with a choice: either accept greico infected silicone boobs or conclude that the significance of the observer is a deconstruction of the teeny titty committee. The subject is interpolated into a neomaterialist fuckwittery that includes reality as a whole. It could be said that Lacan’s model of predialectic constructive boob theory implies that culture is used to reinforce pussy hunting, but only if art is distinct from narrativity; if that is not the case, reality comes from the collective monkeyhole.
.
An abundance of discourses concerning the common ground between crushing pussy and douche-culture may be found. But the main theme of the works of Tarantino is the role of the participant as writer, ergo, twatwaffles rule the roost.
.
Debord uses the term ‘capitalist predialectic bullshit’ to denote the defining characteristics of horse peeing, and hence the absurdity, of neotextual class boobies. Therefore, the premise of neomaterialist nihilism states that art is capable of significance when found in a wet moist cunt.
.
The subject is contextualised into a capitalist predialectic boob theory that includes consciousness as a paradox. Thus, the primary theme of Long’s critique of neomaterialist nihilism is a self-falsifying totality, i.e., utterly douchetastic horsecrap whipped up by the Debordian media spectacle.
.
Any number of sublimations concerning predialectic boob theory exist. But Lyotard suggests the use of deconstructivist rationalism to attack class divisions between boobs and boobs and boobie boobie boobs and the holy triangle in front of the grandiose ass pear of transcendental categories of super sexy suckle thigh horny wah wah porch beef.
.
son.

6:35 pm July, 10 The Dude said...

When I said I don’t mind fake boobs, this pic was NOT what I meant!

6:39 pm July, 10 The Dude said...

and, Troy — wtf were you saying? I get lost in each paragraph. Not lost between big boobies lost, and not Lost™ with a camera crew on some fuccen realism program, no — lost like what the fuck are you talking about? At least it’s funny!

7:20 pm July, 10 Troy Tempest said...

@Dude -
It’s a Markov process. There’s a bunch of them around. That one was the PostModernism generator. It automagically spits out several pages of complete bullshit in a postmodernist style. It picks up where Sokal left off. So, I just generate some postmodern spew and substitute words with boobie or boobs and then introduce suckle etc. and just keep adding more as I go until it jsut tunrs into a sex text maisma. Kabingo. You can do it yourself. Generate some spew and modifiy it to your heart’s content:
.
http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/
.
hit reload to generate more spew.

8:38 pm July, 10 creature said...

he said spew…heh heh

Leave a Reply