-
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Melvin’s Striped Shirt has Pink Lining
I just thought the world should know.
Oh Nicole.
How I would lightly, and with great pensivity, pokey prod the lower part of your hiney region with my childhood Battlestar Gallactica brain alien until you whimpered softly about the sixth grade teacher who used to spank you with a ruler, and your deep-rooted shame that you kind of liked it.
Wednesday, May 11, 2011Ask DB1: Non-Douchey Body Products?
——-
DB1-
I just watched an Old Spice commercial. They’re trying to – er, “spice” up their brand from the old man image. It won’t work for me, because my dad wore Old Spice. But I digress.
Are there any nice-smelling body products for men that aren’t douchey?
I use Arid XX unscented on my pits, and one of those no-brand ocean sniff body wash things, but if I want to get a prize stink on, where should I shop?
We need a tight list of douche-resistant flavor enhancements, for the sake of the hotts!
Please keep up the great work.
Sincerely,
– The Dude
——
Axe = douchebag.
So let it be written.
So let it be done.
The rest must be judged on a case by case basis, but if the word “bodyspray,” or any implication of seductive powers imparted through the purchasing power of a bottle of canned aerosol that sells for $3.56 at Rite-Aid, exists, then autobag takes place as well.
Wednesday, May 11, 2011American Lick
Now we know what our Founding Fathers fought for.
The freedom to mock douchewank with golden unearned dog tags in presence of Kimmy Swimmer Hott.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011Asian Orange and America’s Imperialist Legacy
The effects of America’s use of Asian Orange in the 90s and 00s continues to be felt around the world.
It is what Frantz Fanon describes as “Post-colonialist reconstruction of the alterity of orangeness through the prism of the self.”
Sometimes our spray of global cultural spew can be seen in strange mutant hybrids, like we see here, in the form of Asbestos Flaygon.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011Reader Mail: The Unifying Principle
Reader Charles Douchewin writes in with an academic biology perspective:
——
DB1,
I’m finishing my PhD in evolutionary biology, a process from which I find occasional escape at HCwDB.com. During quiet moments here in my academic ivory tower, and by ivory tower I mean roach-infested storage closet of an office, I casually ponder both pear and the evolutionary dynamics of douchebaggery.
The hallmarks of baggery are easily recognized (Louis 2008) and may be influenced by elements such as product branding or sexual selection (John-from-Vegas 2009; Sir-Hate-A-Douche 2010).
However I suspect the origins of douchebaggery, as you have suggested (Louis 2007), lie within a more unifying principle.
Recently, a reader at HCwDB.com asked a particularly insightful question “Does a Douchebag know he is a Douchebag?” (Jamie 2011).
I propose the answer is No, and it’s here that a unifying principle may be found. Self-deception, particularly as articulated in Robert Trivers’s evolutionary theory of self-deception (Trivers 2000; Trivers 2002) could explain the douchadox, and become a central element supporting a Douchebag theory.
Trivers proposes; “For a solitary organism, the prospects seem difficult, if not hopeless. In trying to deal effectively with a complex, changing world, where is the benefit in misrepresenting reality to oneself? Only in interactions with other organisms, especially con-specifics, would several benefits seem to arise. Because deception is easily selected between individuals, it may also generate self-deception, the better to hide ongoing deception from detection by others. In this view, the conscious mind is, in part, a social front, maintained to deceive others — who more readily attend to its manifestations than to those of the actor’s unconscious mind.” (Trivers 2002)
In essence, the douchbag or baguette is so deeply unaware of their own douchieness that potential mates interpret the douche’s projections of self importance as honest signals of fitness. Such a Douchebag theory appears consistent with a multi-stage progression of douchebaggery and of course, the existence of oldbags.
If indeed douchebags are victims of their own mind – they deserve our sympathy. And by sympathy I mean mock-induced cognitive dissonance. So in a world without a total perspective vortex device (Adams 1980), which may or may not be helpful anyway (depending on your perspective) I encourage the mock, at least from an escapable distance.
— Charles Douchwin
References:
Adams, D. (1980). The hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy. New York, Harmony Books.
Jamie. (2011). “Ask DB1: The chicken or the bag?” Hot Chicks with Douchebags.com
John-from-Vegas. (2009). “Ask DB1: Blaming the Bleeth?” Hot Chicks with Douchebags.com
Louis, J. (2007). “Rodin’s The Doucher Revisited.” Hot Chicks with Douchebags.com
Louis, J. (2008). Hot Chicks with Douchebags, Simon Spotlight Entertainment.
Trivers, R. (2000). “The Elements of a Scientific Theory of Self-Deception.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907(1): 114-131.
Trivers, R. (2002). The Elements of a Scientific Theory of Self-Deception. Natural selection and social theory : selected papers of Robert L. Trivers. New York, Oxford University Press: 271-293.
————–
Tuesday, May 10, 2011Desmond’s Tutu
There’s a back story here involving a dead billionaire’s will, a buxom blonde in a corvette, sixteen piglets and a wacky sign language making chimpanzee named “Willie.”
Unfortunately, I taped over that VHS tape when I was 10. Because “Just One of the Guys” was on HBO.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011Bird Poo on a T-Shirt
There’s a significant amount of critical discourse and cultural detritus we could unpack from this image.
Instead, I’ll simply point out: Bird Poo on a T-Shirt.
And boobies.
Phenomenal, phenomenal boobies.
Like ripe melons in the garden of Gesthemane. I would pluck and nuzzle and sacrifice a goat to Ganesh in thanks.
Monday, May 9, 2011Jacques Doucheteau Tags Señor Pud-a-Bator
Reader Jacques Doucheteau provides the tag as well as the commentary:
————————-
Holy effin’ kee-rap! That is a LOT of Miller High Life!
The Cheesy Gordita dribble stains down the front of of Señor Pud-a-bator’s wife-beater makes this scene of debauchery all the more enraging. And what’s with the tiny dog tag bling? Did Diesel start selling micro-dog tags for $80 or is this guy fifteen feet tall?
And oh, Stephanie and Jamie.
Jamie tries her best to looks sexy for the camera with her kissy-face duck lips, knowing full well that in twelve years time her three kids and diabetic cankles will reduce her romantic life to Passions and court TV with the occasional craigslist one night stand.
But Stephanie unknowingly beckons my penile acquiescence with her oblivious smile, matted eyeliner, and nose piercing her friend gave her one night when they were, soooooo drunk (giggle). Mmmmm, Stephanie.
I would zip-line using my own scrotum, bear-ass naked though a dense metallic dildo forest with a rare earth magnet imbedded in my colon, just for the mere opportunity to lick Sbarro pizza grease off the counter of the Claire’s store she bought those ridiculously gaudy hoop earrings at as part of a buy-2-get-1-free promotion.
Damnit, I need to get out more.
– Jacques Doucheteau
——
Pop Quiz: Jimmy Pud’s Douchetributes
Pop Quiz time, kids.
Which of the following is the douchiest of all the douchetributes on Jimmy Pud:
A. Fake rolex watch
B. 80s sunglasses on a necklace
C. Flannel undies poke in a poolside environment
D. Stupid red gourami fish fauxhawk
E. The fact Mandy’s oh so soft and tender boobage has somehow, due purely to Chaos Theory presumably, wound up pressing into Jimmy Pud’s chest scribble tatt.
Answer now!
Monday, May 9, 2011The NBA… It’s Creeepppptastic!
National Basketball Association “superfan” James Goldstein demonstrates the real point of professional sports.
Rich, creepy ass oldbags oggling cheerleaders while sweaty men run in the background.
Or, as Marx once termed it, The Douchetarian Aristocracy and the Exploitation of the Boobie Hottie.