Your Week-end Video – Incompetently Late “tip-to-tip” tribute Edition
I’m not sure if you “people” (no racist) have been watching Silicon Valley on HBO or not, from writer Mike Judge (Idiocracy, Beavis & RevChad, Office Space, etc., et. al., con carne, per diem).
Mr. Judge has been our NostrilDouchous, if you will, foreseeing the societal damnation if we on the Wall don’t hold the line agin’ the Doucheous Whore’ds .
Well although the new series Silicon Valley started off kinda slow, it ended with what has now been universally agreed upon as the greatest Weenus Joke, both high-and-low-minded, e’er broadcast to the masses. The formula you will see in the background on the clip I link’d below was actually verified by engineers from Stanford, and no I am not making that up.
Brothers in Socks – I give you (no homo): “Optimal Tip-to-Tip Efficiency”.
You may offer your burnt tributes in the comments sections.
Hot Swaps.
I lost it at “hot swap”.
.
Sons.
They forgot the JSCCT (Jesus Sized Cock Coefficient Theorem).
.
whereas > JSCC/envy=.75(800 Penii)(Turgidity) 0r
.
JSCC= .75(envy)(800 Penii)(Turgidiity)
.
This only applies in a room temperature medium to avoid the cool water shrinkage. And I ensure a 75% confidence interval. 10 times out of 20. And shit.
.
While Charles Douchewin validates my Theorem, remember to vote for the Progressive Conservatives,….. Ontarians. Cause if ya want an ugly, lyin’ , skeleton looking, muff diving leader, he should have a cock.
.
My name is Chadwick Kroeger Jr. and I approve this message. Please don’t vote for lesbian Napoleon Dynamite.
.
Exhibit 1
.
The only question I have about the Rev’s maths, is assigning value to envy.
.
Here, his possible use of it as a constant is an important addition – unless it varied. And I’m ignorant as to whether we have data about its variability.
I contend the only rational response to viewing the Rev’s Jesus-Sized cock is absolute envy. Thus the probability of envy should be 1. But Humans aren’t rational (see Greenspan, 1987 to 2006).
Therefore, using a bayesian framework and assuming a prior envy of 1, it would be very interesting to explore the demographic variability of the posterior probability distribution of envy.
I predict only douchebags and the insane would show posterior distributions of less than one. Thus we could develop a probabilistic assignment of douchebag status solely based on an individual’s response within a demographically adjusted distribution of responses – to viewing the Rev’s cock.
.
Or we could just look at their pics, and mock, as usual.
.
.
P.S.
I just called the university ethics board to see if they were cool with me running this study, and it seems they want to meet with ME! Maybe they’re giving me a grant!
Beavis and Rev Chad? Probability of 1? You guys are a godamned gifted! Son.
.
@ Charles Douchewin
.
Make sure to show up with a a large dildo for demonstration purposes. People on these types of committees usually lack imagination and foresight when it comes to genius. They have to be shown in gross and gory detail before they understand. Why just last year I made a proposal to study female arousal by middle aged faculty members (see what I did there?) and somehow I would up having a nice conversation with my dean. Go figure? I’m appealing both the lack of funds and my impending dismissal.
@ Dr. Bunsen,
I hear you; visuals and data-graphics are key. I brought some. Fortunately, Leah the Mullatto spoke up on my behalf. She said we should take her word that the study is NOT necessary; then purred like Cat Woman.
.
It was all pretty awkward.