Monday, September 28, 2009

In Defense of Frats


Frat Five Freddy writes in:

—-
Good morning DB1.

First I beg to differ that all Fraternities are filled with douchebags. Mine is not, but the one across our street is. And here is a picture of one of the “brothers” in action.

-Cheers,
— Frat Five Freddy

—-

Defending frats with evidence of douchery in frats doesn’t really build a strong case, FFF. But I hear your point. Delta House was a frat, and they, of course, set the standard for comedy greatness.

I hereby declare the law of fratbaggery to be non-inversenal. Simply being in a Frat does not make one an automatic Fratbag, but it does increase the odds of douchal taint.

Let B = D.B. (douchebag)
Let F= Fraternity

F can = FB or -FB.

However, F increases the likelihood of DB, therefore F increases likelihood of FB in a violate, but not determinate relationship.

# posted by douchebag1

Leave a Reply

What is 10 + 2 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)