Thursday, August 12, 2010
A Quorum Has Been Called: Tina’s Nomination for “Hall of Hott”
Enough readers have emailed that a quorum must be called.
On our agenda: The nomination of Tina for our hallowed Hall of Hott. Only five or six hot pockets make it a year, so weigh this decision appropriately.
Tina appeared last week posing with Randy Schlongson, demonstrating a perfection of leg curve and delightful hothouse hot flower angelic face of ice cream suckle gnaw.
So we have been tasked with an important decision.
Does Tina’s electrifying appearance warrant an accelerated pass to our hallowed Hall of Hott?
Weigh in with your thoughts in the comments thread.
Same angle, same facial expression. I call “one-angle angel” and will need further evidence to assure a Yes vote.
No. Not with that pic. She’s gonna have to do better than that. Anyone can have one awsome pic.
I both agree and disagree with Medusa. To whit, I think there’s enough face exposure in both pics for us to know that the face is gorgeous, but it would be nice to see it from a different angle. The second pic (showing us the ass and legs of OHMYGODLOOKATTHEM perfection) gives us a pretty good idea that she has some cleavages, but some more evidence of boobie nummie would be nice too. However, despite not having some more face or boob evidence, on what we have so far (which the butt, legs, and back arch that makes me want to slap my wife), I’ll vote Yes.
Actually, I take that back. My vote is No. She is *so* close to a Yes, but I will need more evidence.
^ I’m concerned about possible Gunt.
Oh goodness grief. This is going to get messy… in my pants. I need a few moments… and some Kleenex, to ruminate over this.
Brb.
No. But, I’d love to put my Balabushka into her rear pocket with a little high right English.
The Gilligan in my pants cry “Yasssss”, like the olden wind of Jericho.
She’s working it. She’s spending time in front of the mirror and at the beautician’s.
.
I say yes if we attach an addendum to make a Francine wing. Fuckers
Possible….need more evidence. The Hall voters must have a full “body of work” to properly masturbate…er…evaluate.
I am not sure. Medusa could be right about the gunt. Maybe she’s a Milf HoH?
No, pending further evidence. These two pics leave too much to the imagination. We need to be well informed when voting HoH. And by informed, I mean cleavite, or side boob, or butt crack.
It was legs and booty that did for her in the first picture. I have to agree with Medusa and call for more evidence. I need to see that full frontal and a facial expression change.
.
.
.
Ah who am I kidding, I don’t give a shit if she makes it or not, I just need more alone time material…
No, let’s not lower our standards, although all of us would give away our freedoms just for one night with her.
My head says no but my cue says “Yaaaaaas”.
.
So, you know, yes.
Medusa is probably right, sadly. Even I have a good angle photographed from which I sorta kinda maybe look pretty good. I suspect Tina’s face is unequal in some way: I’m thinking her right eye is on a weird angle. I have also seen a tranny on the internet (where else?) that looks just like this one, so…
Hmmm lesseee….
Red headed tan hotness – very rare – check
Little black dress that doesn’t overstate or over bleath, it shows all the right then in perfect proportions – check
Cute, sultry, innocent, inviting smile with eyes that say “I’ma tear you apart” – check
Legs (do we need to go any further?) – check
Everything is there! She is totally HoH material, by far….. but like my other bag-hunting brothers I must agree. we need at least one more piece of evidence.
I think we are all on the same page her in that her “body” of work so far is quite admirable and HoH worthy however the jury is till out in my book as we need more evidence and by evidence I mean some full frontal.
.
Where is Dicy?????
HOH should have a certain standard.
All I can say is compare her to the Hotts already in.
She doesn’t make the cut, IMHO
I vote no
Laws a sweet smellin’ mercy. I say yes to this vixen of vivacious deliciousness. What I would give to tie her up in the back of my windowless van for a few hours of awkward leering. Yes sirree, she’s the chickee for me. To the Hall with thee!
–
–
Vernon C. Cartwright, CPA
Prudential – Real Estate Division
Sherman Oaks Office, 3rd Floor
Now hang on here… The way we each make sense of who we are as douche mockers and hott handlers is through pictures. Our personal stories, which feed off and add to other stories around us – those that we get from the media, family and friends, as well as those told by ‘experts’ such as teachers, scientists, politicians, religious leaders and other public figures, reveal how we understand, how things should be done or not done and how we think things should be spoken about. Yes? No? Or simply the competing stories of manhood? If one does not toe the line does that somehow make them less than manly? All very interesting. All very status inducing… Thus onto Tina: I like the look of Tina. Whether I could stand being in her presence for any length of time or not is difficult to say from merely taking a few lustful glances at a couple of photos of her. But one thing I know, being a man, a man who mocks douche, is all about being an individual.
In an effort to chase our manhood we often chase adventure. However we sometimes forget the economic and cultural power that allows us to go on such adventures. Yet how adventurous a spirit does one need to have? That is to say, how much staying power and courage does one really have to have when at any given time it’s possible to pack up and go home to easy living and safety?
Therefore fellow ‘baggers, I urge caution in the granting of this somewhat exclusive classification. Tina is hott, but she is also surrounded by several questionable props that suggest she can, somehow, beat nature. Do I need to remind you that we can never beat nature?
I would say yes, though more pictures will be necessary to confirm my vote.
I wanna see her ass pear. And bare boobies.
.
But who doesn’t?
No, but I would be happy to look at about 100 pictures of her.
meh
On second thought, I’d need to see only one more picture of her but with her dress on backwards!!!! (;-)
Arghh i say NAY! Not a hall of hot material! ITS A NAY ARGGHH
‘she is also surrounded by several questionable props’
To propose a mere bagatelle…:
#1 Randy Schlongson
#2 poor mans Deborah Harry
# 3 Schlongson’s hideous blue shoes
Put me in the “more evidence needed” camp. Specifically, more skin and different angles. Preferably swimsuit, though she doesn’t seem that type to me.
No!! No way!!! FUCK NO!!!!!
This girl is mildly attractive, at best. Yeah, I’d turn my head to take a second look if I saw her at WalMart, but that’s it. No boner, no dirty fantasies over this girl.
Now, I am with Vin Douchal that Francine is hott. But not this one.
Those of you who voted yes need to get laid immediately.
No boobies, no hott.
No boobies, no hott.
No boobies, no hott.
.
I need a full frontal to make this decision, in accordance with Medusa’s gunt concerns above. Until that appears, no.
I say no. On a hotness scale… she’s a lukewarm 7.2
Nay
She is fine, but not HoH material.
She is definitely on track to HOH, and with a few more photos of her significant body parts, I think her smiling red-headed visage might just make that rarefied Hot Air. at any rate, she’s Woo-Hottie Worthy!.
Yes. Absolutely. Yes.
I really want to fuck a girl with fake red hair.
thought i’d let you all know.
I say no, barring further evidence. Perhaps it’s Tina’s bad luck to appear so close to another HoH vote, but I’m feeling conservative about HoH inclusion right now. I like the look of her mischievous smile and lovely gams, but I don’t see inducting another new HoH member based only on a couple of not-great pics and mixed baghunter support.
Put me down for No.
Need more to rise to the level of “Hall of Hott”.
CYNTHIA! CYNTHIA! and i vote no… mmmm cynthia…. *drool*
“rarefied Hot Air”
.
Heh heh, thanks Whoop-Di-Douche.
.
Yeah, I think the results are far to mixed right now for inclusion. I say we put her on the backburner and revisit in another month or two… especially if a few more pics surface. From what I see so far, she has a chance.
.
And by “backburner,” I mean my front loader.
I’d need to see some dental records.
Look to the boobs…they are the center of all things. Until I get a better look at hers I vote no.
Yeah, I’ll give a provisional “no”. Even tho I adore redheads. What I want to know is what kind of pear are you packing?
She has beautiful eyes and a pixyish nose, but playing pool at the prison conjugal visit hall hurts in the overall points tally.
.
To echo my comments on our last vote, the HOH should be reserved for those who truly turn purple heads well, purple. We can’t do anything about the quality of those who are already in but we can certainly stand guard at the entrance and ensure that only those of the highest standard are allowed access.
.
While Tina could polish my que stick and rack my striped balls anyday, I’m going with no.
Oh helllllllllz NO
No. Need more evidence.
Scooby Douche is right.
.
.
I need to get laid, immediately.
Notta…
Absolutely not. Hott? Yes. Hall of Hott? Not a chance.
Ham and Eggs….I mean Hall of Leggs.
If Medusa O. has a concern about “gunt”, then I have a concern about “gunt”
.
I like Crucial’s proposal of sending her back to the second district court of appeals until further evidence arises or the quorum decries “Loneliness!”
.
Perhaps there needs to be a “Foyer of Hott” where candidates must reside and endure commentary until ratification. After a fixed period of time, candidates will either be inducted or expellere.
Thumbs up from me and by up I don’t mean my thumb.
No. And by that I mean, no.
I need further evidence. but with the lack thereof, I would vote NO
Ïs thät ä pröpösïtïön, DärkSöck?
No. Without those huge pumps her legs wouldn’t be looking like anything special, and without those legs she’s exactly that–nothing special.
I’m on strike voting for HoH until Sheena from January 25th is considered. I’m afraid this admittedly attractive young lady is simply not in her class, so if no Sheena, no Tina.
Pamela, from today, on the other hand, could be Sheena’s more-sultry sister. Let’s have a vote on both as a two-fer.
I do like that she wears her Yamakah while playing pool though.
NO! Paid-to Pose Pamela is way more deserving of the H0H honors.
if i have to make a choice between having Francine or Tina bilk me of my wallet, i would choose Tina. so yes, Tina for Hall of Hott.
On the spectrum of hot chicks, she’s decidedly average. No way she belongs in the Hall of Hott.
She is nice but as others have mentioned we need to see more. Nay on this chick. Agree with mr.reeve about Pamela. We need more Pamela but based on that one photo I would vote her into the Hall of Hott.
Yes Legs, No face!… no slouch here by any means and i’d love to do stuff to her that would make Lindsay Lohan blush but Hall of Hott is hallowed ground.
So I Say NOOO!
Nay! I’m surprised someone nominated her.
Not only no but hell no.
I hope she poops on that pool table.
She has a gorgeous face, and legs that I want to enjoy with all five senses. Yes, that’s right, I want to listen to her legs. However, until I can evaluate the quality of her breasticles and midsection, I will abstain from voting.
No way. Notta hotta
Well, if she fails to make it to the HOH, and it appears she won’t, let it be known that the rarefied Hot Air I refer to is not the sharts.
It’s the heavy breathing down the necks of all HOH inductees from 10,000 horny males, creating a permanent “steam heat” misting the lickable parts of all the HOHs.
Negatory, good buddy.
Nope. She doesn’t cut it by a mile.
Sorry, but my vote is no.
No. She’s hot but there’s not enough pear.
I am now out of Baghdad for a while and have a decent hottie compass going and YES…Tina should be so enshrined in HOH. So says me.
Nope. Thoroughly lickable thighs, yes….HoH, no. Paid to pose Pamela, however, looks promising though.
She reminds me of this cougar I used to know who allowed me access to her on vagina on Mondays (because her man was out of town? Never quite figured that one out, nor cared), so out of bitter nostalgia, Tina gets a “ohmygodimaboutto…” yea vote.
Nyet. Although I do approve of Hotts bent over pool tables.
Generally speaking, why not have all the Hall of Hott contenders duke it out in an added bonus round to the yearly Douchies?….
Hott’s will always be coming, so a clear head-to-head vote either monthly, quarterly or yearly seems legit to me.
In the end, we end up with the ultimate Hott & ultimate Douche every year.
I’m not into chicks but i can see her clearly ripping the felt off of the pool table easily Tina ….that’s not smart!
No? NO???
.
You vote in favor of something, you believe it’s the right thing! If you believe it’s the wrong thing, you vote no! I will not yield to the baghunter, and the baghunter will observe regular order! If he gets up and yells like he’s going to intimidate people into believing he’s right! He is wrong! The baghunter is wrong! The baghunter is providing cover for his colleagues rather than doing the right thing! It’s baghunters wrapping their arms around baghunters rather than doing the right thing on behalf of the hottness! It is a shame, a shame! If you believe this is a bad idea to put Tina in the HOH, then vote no, but don’t give me the cowardly view that, oh, if only I saw her boobies — the baghunter will observe regular order and sit down! I will not! The baghunter will sit!
.
(yes)
no
She only made me jerk off once…so no…better luck next time…
I vote no. Tina’s body promises photographic perfection and visual delights, and her visage is sharp and pointy in its foxiness, but she is the kind of girl where you think “yeah, she’s hot” and then you look at the next hott and think “yeah, she’s hot”, and then at the next one and so on.
The Hall is for breath stopping face-hitting-brick-wall hate-want-must-have-can’t-get inducing hottness only.
Table the vote until more evidence comes to light, man. Redheads are dangerously psycho so we need to be sure before a lifetime commitment.
Based on current evidence…NAY!
No way. Paid to Pose Pamela of even Sophie blow this chick out of the water.
Looking like one has a broken neck is hot?
NO!
Although she is hot and notably hotter than many of the current HoH inductees, I must vote no. Let’s not water down the HoH.
Pam, though, that is definitely worthy.
No. Not even close.
From what I see of her, she is ridiculously hot. But I just can’t see enough of her. So I gotta say no.
candidate for a dong drape, but, HOH? nah
To begin it, I don’t find her very hot at all. But that’s me.
.
Then, she is fucking stupid in looks and attitude. Complete lack of intelligence (intelligent=sexy; stupid=stupid) And therefore deserves no prize or recognition whatsoever on part of intelligent and sexy people.
.
Let the uncharming fools recognize in her what she is not.