Thursday, January 19, 2012

Reader Mail: The End of Librarian Hott Purity?

Mr. Biggs snapped this pic of Librarian Hott meeting a vortex of Douche Woo.

This tasks us with the following:

Have the signifiers of Librarian Hott neurotic-erotic entanglement become so coopted as to have become conceptually Bleethed?

And yes, the fact that that last sentence can communicate despite linguistic nonsensical phrasing gives me a deep and profound joy. Take that, Noam Chomsky.

# posted by douchebag1
9:55 am January, 19 Dude McCrudeshoes said...

I see schoolgirl hott, notsomuch librarian hott.

10:02 am January, 19 Ferris said...

I say no. The d-bag will always pursue hotts in all their various, mouthwatering forms. If the succulent librarian hotts become monochromatic, cultural decline cliches, then so are all the other forms of delicious sluts whom I envision prancing naked in springtime meadows as I swab my groin with warmed terry cloth towels.

What I mean is, its a slippery slope.

10:08 am January, 19 Nancy Dreuche said...

You just have to learn to recognize the librarian hotts from the librarian notts. But that means looking past the glasses. I understand how difficult that can be for some of you. Men sure enjoy those visual clues.

10:12 am January, 19 wonderdouche twin said...

Nancy states it best, as usual.

.

Librarian Hott link, is a nott. “Societal Turd” is a better Librarian hott than Librarian nott Megan.

10:18 am January, 19 Mr. Biggs said...

This gives me a deep and profound joy too. Not the pic, this post. The pic makes me weep for my college days.

10:21 am January, 19 The Reverend Chad Kroeger said...

I clicked on the link after I got home and smoked a doobie for the pain and my generally poor-being and thought I was back in December 08, 2011 having a flashback and wondering how I posted the Lisa Loeb video again.

.

So since I got a boner for her when I was stoned and thought I was back in time, am I still cheating in my heart?

10:25 am January, 19 The Reverend Chad Kroeger said...

^I don’t fucking care. Ima start cheating again with solid female bodies of any shape cause I’m bored and I am lowering my standards. which had previously low.

10:28 am January, 19 Douchble Helix said...

When they co-opt the True Librarian Hotts, that’s they day I say ‘Enough is enough, already.”

10:40 am January, 19 The Reverend Chad Kroeger said...

I don’t hink I should have been out of the house cause I,m drunk as shit. Anybody looking for some action against the Giants this week you bunch of librarian ho ogling bastards.

.

49ers

10:41 am January, 19 Nancy Dreuche said...

@DH, who is “they”?

10:49 am January, 19 Charles Douchewin said...

Identfications based on singular variable traits can be erronious.

.

Identifications based on multiple concordant traits, that are consistent with a type, are more reliable.

.

For example: Alone, each of the Village People could easily be interpreted as a policeman, biker, indian, construction worker, army recruit or cowboy.

.

However, when they all sing and dance together on stage, I tend not to be confused about their true profession.

.

.

Also, appearances can be unreliable indices of character – except, of course, for the Gynochin.

.

In the case DB1 proposes here, one need only talk to the douche/bleeth in question to see if their responses are consistent with their appearance.

10:56 am January, 19 Nancy Dreuche said...

@Charles D. Incorporating “The Village People” into your analysis of Librarian Hotts FTW.

11:28 am January, 19 Anonymous said...

^Nancy – Thanks.

.

But I realize I didn’t directly address DB1’s question.

.

If I understand; the question, paraphrased, is “does the co-opting of a signal, change the meaning of that signal?”

.

I think that one’s misinterpretation of a signal based on ignorance of the signals origin, or co-option of the signal by a different group, does not change the original meaning of the signal.

.

As an extraordinary example, consider the swastika. Throughout many cultures in antiquity, the symbol has generally represented benevolent reverence.

.

But once the crazy Nazi party got hold of it, western culture has largely become unaware of its historical uses.

.

For example: If the SS wore teddy bear patches, we might all view teddy bears very differently.

.

For an example related to this site: consider if Snooki started wearing an Emily Dickens mask. Would anyone consider Emily Dickenson bleethy?

11:32 am January, 19 Charles Douchewin said...

Apologies. The above post was me.

.

Also, I apparently can’t spell Emily Dickinson.

11:44 am January, 19 Wedgie said...

Rev:

I would be interested in placing a small non-monetary wager (it’s illegal, after all) on the 49ers to prevail against your Giants. No points, straight bet. What prize do you offer?

Sucka.

12:33 pm January, 19 Ferris said...

@Douchewin. Dickinson? I’d put my Dick in her, son.

The comma is important there. Otherwise it takes on a whole different, disturbing meaning.

12:44 pm January, 19 Wheezer said...

Peggy Sue really shouldn’t have taken that photo with a ‘roided up Cruddy Holly. Even Gary Busey looks at him and says, “What a wanker!”

.

Time for another plane to take a dive…..as long as Librarian Hott Peggy Sue is safe with me and not flying.

12:53 pm January, 19 The Reverend Chad Kroeger said...

@Wedgie

.

I offer a bottle of Canada’s finest whiskey, in my opinion , as well as several international competitions. A 40 oz. bottle of Forty Creek Barrel Select. It is their basic rye. I have three two ounce shots neat two times a week at my Dad’s and it goes down like ambosia. I’d keep it in the house if I didn’t have the problem.

.

And you?

12:56 pm January, 19 The Dude said...

The Dude’s belated Meh Culpa’s from the 2011 Librarian Hott Award:

After offering to pick the 2011 Librarian Hott, I could tell this was a tough category, for two reasons — lack of clear LH examples, and the fact that everyone has their opinion about LH cached away until one of us tries to pick one.

.

I observed in great detail the decline of proper LH’s in the 2011 catalog, opening my thought process to concepts like “What Hott Would I Want in my Personal Liberry?” and yes, Nancy — I chose to seek the glasses behind which may rest the cranium of the sweetest, keenest bonerfidest Librarian Hott.

.

.

The Mayan Coitus gal certainly deserved mention; for that I will languish at the feet of any Mayan Hott who will have me.

.

Librarian Laura keeps looking right through me for not mentioning her.

.

wonderdouche twin, I disagree about Societal Turd. I think that has to do with some kind of sick thing going on in your own head.

.

Meh

1:12 pm January, 19 Nancy Dreuche said...

@The Dude, you did the best you could with the current level of skill you had. It took yeeears of observation from my wallflower vantage point and a memory and thought process unhindered by any severe alcohol and drug abuse to keenly size up people the way I can. You’ll get there and when you do you’ll be able to spot the librariest librarian hott the first time. Instead of like it hitting you like a ton of books about bricks two years later.

1:45 pm January, 19 Wedgie said...

Rev:

Maker’s Mark. I don’t know if I can get Forty Creek here in the land of heathens and dismemberments under the Hollyweird sign. I will ask around.

If you can live with Maker’s, it’s a bet. But maybe you should check out the extended weather forecast for the Bay Area first. Fair warning.

5:23 pm January, 19 Stephanie said...

Books are so sexy,you know that?

6:41 pm January, 19 DarkSock said...

Watch it Reverend…you’ll jinx yer team.

.

Makers.

6:41 pm January, 19 DarkSock said...

I’d make make her decimal system dewey.

8:51 pm January, 19 Wedgie said...

I think that guy’s name really is Noam Chompsky.

8:54 pm January, 19 Nostradouchus said...

Chomsky is now officially the biggest douchebag to ever be mentioned on this site. Fact.

10:46 pm January, 19 The Dude said...

Chomsky seems more like a scrud. Perhaps he was douchey in the 1950s, but at least he wrote — oh crap, that was Norman Mailer. Never mind.

7:59 am January, 20 I R A Darth Aggie said...

Agree with Dude McCrudeshoes: school girl hott, in her dad’s den, with douchebag.

.

Who’ll never be seen again as Mr. Dad is about to step into the house, and has a fine collection of firearms.

9:27 pm January, 21 Bret Easton Douchis said...

Charles Douchewin said… “If I understand; the question, paraphrased, is “does the co-opting of a signal, change the meaning of that signal?”

.

All signifiers are context dependent.

.

Wet “Librarian Hott” becomes just another “Identity Kit” that nubile young gals can pick up at the mall….it become commoditized. By the time the “Identikit” make it into clubland, it has transformed into cartoon-like form, a parody of the original intent.

.

(For what is a douchebag but the cartoonish extrapolation of a number of cultural signifiers gone horribly wrong?)

,

Co-opting means death of the original signfier.

.

Nothing pure stays pure.

.

I vote that the concept of Librarian Hott is in danger of becoming trivialized.

.

Then again, I and The Boss will probably continue fwapping to the least tainted of photos of L.H.’s that show up on this site….

.

.

Double-then-again, I’m in a foul mood because my own favorite Library Hottie pen pal has crossed over to the dark side, taking up with another “child-man from the promised land.” (aka Clubland).

.

I burned a candle for the few real (and admittedly endangered) Librarian Hotties out there…

.

Dark Days, as the douchery spreads across the land….

Leave a Reply

What is 14 + 10 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:
IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)